...fatcats?
I have no problem calling 30,000 in a world of 6,000,000,000 "grossly misled," and I think I can do just that.
P.S. "Paul or Hillary" is a false dilemma. Of course I guess I have no idea how to apply logical fallacies so this point is moot.
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
643happyandbored wrote:Rick just made the 911 post in this thread.
spooky
Available in hit crimson or surprising process this calculator will physics up your kitchen
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
645The fact that you would support a person like Paul, who has all of three policies that aren't truly abhorrent and lacks the moral and policy consistency to ensure any success on the few things where he isn't a steaming heap of dung, simply fleshes out the depths of your delusion for us.Rick Reuben wrote:Antero wrote:There's more to this world than your goddamn Federal Reserve.
Every time mainstream liberals try and bump the Fed down the Priority List to #198 ( or all the way off it, for many of them ), I know I'm onto something.
http://www.myspace.com/leopoldandloebchicago
Linus Van Pelt wrote:I subscribe to neither prong of your false dichotomy.
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
646larsxe wrote:nfurnier wrote:There would be big corporations but they would survive on their own merits and not on the back of taxpayers. It would also be easier for smaller companies to compete.
Companies have not survived on "their own merits" since the advent of advertising, press relations and corporate communication. As long as these techniques are employed, the consumer will never be able to choose rationally between goods in the marketplace.
So consumers are sheep and haven't been able to make a rational choice for about 150 years?
Consumers have made rational and irrational choices since the beginning of commerce.
You had me at Sex Traction Aunts Getting Vodka-Rogered On Glass Furniture
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
647P.S.
Jesus! This thing is still going? Didn't it become clear by now that Bob only cares about one issue and that literally EVERYTHING else about Paul is ultimately irrelevant to him, the chief engine of this thread? Just rename the fucking thread "Challenge the illegal banking cartel in the 2008 election" and it never goes past page 10.
Jesus! This thing is still going? Didn't it become clear by now that Bob only cares about one issue and that literally EVERYTHING else about Paul is ultimately irrelevant to him, the chief engine of this thread? Just rename the fucking thread "Challenge the illegal banking cartel in the 2008 election" and it never goes past page 10.
You had me at Sex Traction Aunts Getting Vodka-Rogered On Glass Furniture
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
648Between his support for the ludicrous 9/11 conspiracy theories and his support for the crackpot racist Ron Paul, should we really be giving any credence to what Rick Reuben says?
I mean, really?
I mean, really?
Gay People Rock
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
649You know what I like about Ron Paul? He pisses off a lot of people, both mild and extreme. It's the only thing I like about him, but it sure is swell!
it's not the length, it's the gersch
Presidential Contender: Ron Paul
650I'm sure he really cares what you think of him.
Why defend cunts?