jimmy spako wrote:did you hear this one on radiolab?
i think i remember it from there, they observed brain states while asking the questions. believe that most people would flip the switch but hesitate to push the man. the corresponding brain states were very different.
of course rationally there is no difference. in both scenarios, you are actively using the other person's death to save four people. but the average person balks at pushing the fat dude.
i like to delude myself that there is a cool solution involving a bullwhip where everybody survives, but in reality i'd probably take too much time thinking about it & the four workers would get squashed.
Radiolab by proxy. This American Life was too lazy to do their own story, so they took it from them.
If you're in situation A, there is probably nothing else you can do. The train is probably very close.
If you're in situation B, a large man would not stop the train by itself, it would be the the impact of hitting a large man that would get the engineers attention and the train would stop. But if YOU jumped off the bridge, the train would stop as well, so unlike situation A, there is a solution that still results in only 1 dead and it does not require someone dying involuntarily.
That is why situation B is worse in my mind.