Your Moral Aptitude.

13
Heeby Jeeby is right in how this is perceived - statistically, people are supposed to have far more qualms with the second scenario and the results are allegedly stable across different nationalities. The first scenario's death is seen to result as an unfortunate consequence of pulling the lever and saving four lives but in the second, the bridge dude is seen as more of an active sacrifice.
Image

Your Moral Aptitude.

14
Tom wrote:Situation A:

A Train is coming down the tracks. There are 4 workers on the track. They won't see the train, and the train won't see them until it's too late.

There is a switch. Pulling the switch will change the train from its current track (with the 4 workers), to one with only 1 worker on it. Do you pull the switch?


What is the productivity of the single worker? Perhaps, it is greater than the four together. Does he carry a nine-pound hammer? Could possibly be John Henry. This should be taken into account.


Situation B:

A Train is coming down the tracks. There are 4 workers on the track. They won't see the train, and the train won't see them until it's too late.

You are on a bridge over the track with a very large man. If you push the man over the track, it will stop the train and thus save the 4 workers. Do you push him?


Clearly a fat capitalist. Could happily be thrown under the wheels of progress.

B seems the safe option.

Your Moral Aptitude.

16
jimmy spako wrote:did you hear this one on radiolab?

i think i remember it from there, they observed brain states while asking the questions. believe that most people would flip the switch but hesitate to push the man. the corresponding brain states were very different.


of course rationally there is no difference. in both scenarios, you are actively using the other person's death to save four people. but the average person balks at pushing the fat dude.


i like to delude myself that there is a cool solution involving a bullwhip where everybody survives, but in reality i'd probably take too much time thinking about it & the four workers would get squashed.



Radiolab by proxy. This American Life was too lazy to do their own story, so they took it from them.

If you're in situation A, there is probably nothing else you can do. The train is probably very close.

If you're in situation B, a large man would not stop the train by itself, it would be the the impact of hitting a large man that would get the engineers attention and the train would stop. But if YOU jumped off the bridge, the train would stop as well, so unlike situation A, there is a solution that still results in only 1 dead and it does not require someone dying involuntarily.

That is why situation B is worse in my mind.

Your Moral Aptitude.

17
B_M_L wrote:The difference is that in option 2 you could jump yourself. You don't have to kill someone innocent to save the lives of others.

In this senario would you push fatty? Or give your own life.


Beat me to the punch.

You could try to land on the windshield of the train.



And btw... I said very large, not fat.

He is not the fatty capitalist. He is the brawny worker.

Your Moral Aptitude.

19
Tom wrote:
B_M_L wrote:The difference is that in option 2 you could jump yourself. You don't have to kill someone innocent to save the lives of others.

In this senario would you push fatty? Or give your own life.


Beat me to the punch.

You could try to land on the windshield of the train.


No fucking way. The situation described in the original post implies the 'large man' will stop the train. Linguistically you are lead to believe it is his large size that will stop the train not the engineer noticing. It's supposed to be a dilemma not a riddle.

If this is indeed the 'right' answer then it really is a good test...to find out what percentage of people are big fat fucking liars.

Go on someone be the first to say that they'd jump off on to the train to save the workers lives...


LIAR!

Your Moral Aptitude.

20
Heeby Jeeby wrote:
Tom wrote:
B_M_L wrote:The difference is that in option 2 you could jump yourself. You don't have to kill someone innocent to save the lives of others.

In this senario would you push fatty? Or give your own life.


Beat me to the punch.

You could try to land on the windshield of the train.


No fucking way. The situation described in the original post implies the 'large man' will stop the train. Linguistically you are lead to believe it is his large size that will stop the train not the engineer noticing. It's supposed to be a dilemma not a riddle.

If this is indeed the 'right' answer then it really is a good test...to find out what percentage of people are big fat fucking liars.

Go on someone be the first to say that they'd jump off on to the train to save the workers lives...


LIAR!


A. I'm a large guy.
B. I don't agree with your interpretation. I think the person needs to be large enough to make an impact to get his attention. You'd have to be like 4 tons to actually stop a train. A skinny fella, the train would run over without noticing. A Man with form would make more of a thud.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests