That video was the perfect antidote to the video I posted. Initially I was sort of going along with them, but it got increasingly unhinged as it went. I read The Future of the Professions a few years ago because I'm an architect, well I now am the technology manager at a firm after a career pivot, and its a job that is definitely ripe for AI disruption. We're seeing it already with automated apartment layout tools and in visualization tools like Mid Jounery. But so far the deep tools are far from "there" or ever close. A friend of mine is a lawyer that worked at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, they have been using LLM for paralegal work for a long time. Lawyers are definitely in line for some disruption. But like Angela says in the video you posted... you can't have an economy based on bots talking to each other.W.L.Weller wrote: Thu Sep 18, 2025 2:41 pm You're welcome, it's a good reminder that it's worth talking about the good stuff (even if it's good stuff about bad stuff) one comes across, since everyone's feeds/algorithms/apps are so balkanized.
Did I already post about Ed Zitron's newsletter Where's Your Ed At? I'm lazy so instead of looking up-thread I'll post it (again): https://www.wheresyoured.at/how-to-argu ... i-booster/
Dang I need a raise so I can subscribe to more stuff.
As I said earlier, I don't really see LLMs as "AI"... there's not really any intelligence in there, or even in pattern recognition "AI"... Great tools, but "intelligent" only in so far as they seem that way. But that doesn't mean they are.
