In Rainbows is glorious and gorgeous. It has one misstep which is "House of Cards," an unfocused sort-of-dubby overlong waste that serves only as a chance to recover from the brilliance of "Reckoner."
Radiohead is not an experimental band. They use techniques pioneered by experimental bands in an incredibly precise, cerebral fashion. This is important. It is a waste of time to say "They're not actually experimental!" because they're not. They just do it better.
More to the point, Radiohead has an intense melodic sensibility that exceeds basically everyone, and the classical compositional sense to take that and turn it into something extraordinary. "Jigsaw Falling Into Place" runs through a dozen variations of a similar melodic form before finally landing on the obvious and most consonant melody for the very last sung line of the song.
I do not listen to their first two albums.
Pablo Honey is kinda shitty, and
The Bends, with the exception of "Street Spirit," is pointless next to
OK Computer for listening purposes.
Hail To The Thief has good moments, but is bloated and uninspired compared the the albums that preceded it.
OK Computer, Kid A, Amnesiac, and [/i]In Rainbows[/i] are works of genius, and, furthermore, display a unified creative force that is an utter rarity in bands.
So fuck the haters. I realize some people don't care about melody or composition, or would rather feel cool by hating something popular while fellating other things that are popular within their scene, but it's your fucking loss.
NerblyBear wrote:OK COMPUTER is an astonishing album.
IN RAINBOWS has a handful of very beautiful tracks and is quite a worthwhile purchase.
Everything else is pretty worthless.
I question the possibility of even making this a remotely coherent musical opinion, given
Kid A and
Amnesiac. I don't understand how one could possibly like
In Rainbows and
OK Computer without thinking, "Fuck, man. Motion Picture Soundtrack is pretty gorgeous."