sunlore wrote:My final comment was partly in jest. That said, marxist socialism still represents around thirty percent of the electorate here. Those folks would be happy to tell you that what the revolution spiraled to doesn't necessarily reflect on the initial intentions.ant man bee wrote:Is the Russian Revolution really something that should be aspired to when you take into account what it spiraled into?
Well initial intentions are all well and good....having said that, I believe that it is the unfortunate reality that the ideals which were espoused in that revolution cannot be upheld in a mass society without the rise of dictatorial power. It looks really really good on paper and I really wish that it were possible. Having said that, it will never come to pass without the death of millions as the end product.
sunlore wrote:Reasonable or not, I just really don't want to have a Christian in power. As an atheist, I don't think this is an unreasonable demand. Nothing good ever came from Christian politics, right? Right. Nothing.ant man bee wrote:Also (while keeping in mind that I am not a Christian and just like to play the devil's advocate) is this *gasp!* Christian a reasonable fellow like most Christians around the world or is he/she a right wing freak that would justify your knee jerk reaction?
Well, as I originally asked, is this person a nutjob, running around to take away gay rights and ban abortion or is this person a rational individual who has a similar ethical code to your own, albeit with a different moral source?
I could give a fuck either way, I am just fed up with the "all christians are backwards thinking fundamentalists" bullshit. It is akin to think that all Muslims are throat slashers. Completely lame.
I would be willing to bet that if an atheist (which I would consider myself as well), ran for office and a christian group started saying that they don't want him/her in power, you would go right off saying how they "condemn others who don't think they way they do" and such....
Pot.Kettle.Black