Gramsci wrote:I'm thinking in terms of Real Politik. It is reality that Israel will not stand for a nuclear Iran. The US know the shit storm that will sweep the region/world if Israel turn Tehran's nuclear sites into big glass ashtrays in the sand.

Grenouille wrote:

Gramsci wrote:I'm thinking in terms of Real Politik. It is reality that Israel will not stand for a nuclear Iran. The US know the shit storm that will sweep the region/world if Israel turn Tehran's nuclear sites into big glass ashtrays in the sand.

Actually I think the arab regimes will be silently grateful if Israel were to destroy Tehran's nuclear sites. One should keep in mind the animosity between arabs and persians. If Israel destroys Iran's nuclear program, it saves Saudi Arabia and Egypt from a nuclear arms race against their non-jewish arch enemy.

Grenouille wrote:No need for a Wehrmacht if you have the bomb. Who needs the SS if you basicly have Auschwitz in a Suitcase and the means to deliver it?

sparky wrote:

For Christ Allah Buddha and Satan's sake, you seem determined to paint the country in the exact same stupid one-eyed light that 95% of Western media depictions do.

Again: the point of this thread was to be informative and offer a corrective to this incessant highlighting of the disgusting extremes of Iran.

Earwicker wrote:Pakistan to my eyes is in a much more dangerous nuclear situation than Iran if you ask me.

sparky wrote:the point of this thread was to be informative and offer a corrective to this incessant highlighting of the disgusting extremes of Iran.

Rick Reuben wrote:Unbelievable. It's like some of you people are robots. Once the bad data is in your hard disk, it's there forever. Do you speak Farsi, grenouille? People who do have DISPROVED the statement you refer to. I've posted the accurate translation of Ahmadinejad's words at least three times on this forum. If you want to stubbornly ignore the truth of this 'wipe Israel off the map' propaganda and instead, cling to an inaccurate translation used by the Empire to fan the flames for a pre-emptive attack in response to a thought crime that never happened, then you're obviously more of a crazed warmonger than I want to waste time on.

The Islamic umma will not allow its historic enemy to live in its heartland

Anyone who signs a treaty which recognises the entity of Israel means he has signed the surrender of the Muslim world

Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury.

There is no doubt that the new wave in Palestine will soon wipe off this disgraceful blot from the face of the Islamic world.

Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism? You should know that this slogan, this goal, can certainly be achieved.

Rick Reuben wrote:You stay in your FOX News world, and keep insisting that this, this, this and this will happen between Iran and Israel when you don't have the evidence to support any of it.

I'll never let people with the moral standing of the Bush administration sell me a second war. You've heard of the expression, "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"? If you let Olmert and Bush fool you on Iran, then the shame is on you.