clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.
Yeah. In Trump v Hawaii, the Supreme Court essentially told him "make at least one country not majority Muslim so we can pretend it's legal and not just a Muslim ban" and then let it through once he complied, despite many public statements where he clearly identified that it was a Muslim ban. Bonus: in the process, they pretended to be overturning the decision that allowed Japanese internment camps. Something to remember for later this year / term.cakes wrote: Thu Jun 05, 2025 1:32 pm I have a feeling this 12 country ban will be lifted by the courts. I dunno, seems illegal, and I haven't looked into it. Remember last time Trump tried a ban like this?
clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.
Holy shit, that's gnarly. Gross stuff. The thing about all of that sort of garbage is before you even have to grapple with the emotions or ethics of this school of thought the science has already moved on. It's all bunk. Geneticists, anthropologists, other biologists have put in the work. Race is a scientifically bunk concept. It's a cultural impression not a consistent way to objectively categorize humans. That's what makes these yahoos so infuriating. They're trying to revive 19th century pseudoscience for purely political reasons.Gramsci wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 8:13 am Speaking of libtards.
A 2021 academic study led by UCLA academics identified Pinker as one of the “political centrists” who have “played a role in legitimizing the ideas of the human biodiversity movement” in a way that has benefited white nationalists, despite not being core proponents themselves.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... ia-podcast
It's what the Christian Republicans use for anyone who opposes them. I'm not using it to insult hypocritical liberals or the disabled.jorsh wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:31 pm oi, can we please stop with "libtard"
i understand the intent isn't to make fun of people w/ disabilities, but it's basically using the r word and there are much better ways to get the point across without also punching down
Edited to my preferred tactic for dealing with tightie righties in the real world. I shall listen to you. I shall provide quality services to you (ethical mandate). I shall acknowledge and defend your basic humanity. I just might fart more often when you're around and I won't accept hateful rhetoric.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest