Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:In his last two starts (versus Pittsburgh and Houston), Mark Mulder has thrown 18 innings (including a complete game ten inning shutout yesterday). In these two games, Mark Mulder surrendered a total of one run, no earned runs, six hits and three walks.
Say what you will about the Pittsburgh and Houston lineups and Mulder's strike/ball ratios in these games. And I wouldn't be entirely comfortable knowing that I had to rely on Mulder for a whole season -- and I certainly would not have traded Haren, Calero and Daric Barton to get him (and his salary). Nevertheless, Mulder's recent results are very impressive.
But at least you're not calling him a "tree trunk".
I can't believe you responded in this way to an obviously silly post.
Or maybe I can.
For the record: Mark Mulder was my personal favorite pitcher of the "Big 3." I wish him no ill will whatsoever. I was fascinated by the possibility that he really might have lost his ability to pitch effectively in the major leagues, and that the Athletics were able to get so much in the trade for him.
It seems as though this isn't the case, so the story isn't really that interesting for me anymore. If he starts to really suck again...it might be interesting again but probably not. In any case, I am really enjoying the players the Athletics got for Mulder, and am extremely glad the trade was made.
Here's an interesting thing to look at when this season is done: will Mulder's ERA be better than Haren's, taking into account the difference between the two leagues? What do you think? I'd almost be willing to bet on Haren.
Now, on the subject of true ace pitchers- the White Sox better take Rich Harden seriously in a couple days. I'll be at the yard to make sure they do.