No.ChudFusk wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 2:02 am Steve's review of John Zorn / Naked City came up in a Zorn FB group https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1698KaGNKm/
Here's a screenshot of the review: https://i.ibb.co/9knm6Ng3/Albini-reviews-Naked-City.jpg
While the discussion was mostly about Steve's taste in music, one weirdo tried to find what I can only assume he thinks is antisemitism in Steve's word choice. It was in reference to Zorn's methods of assembling artists from a variety of backgrounds and drawing from these diverse genres, which Steve called "parasitic." While I don't agree with Steve's assessment, I can't believe he was trying to say anything subversive or "playing with hate" as the commenter says. Am I missing something?
This is insane.
It's very funny to me that rock critics can be such babies about criticism...using regular old language...when it's too incisive, particularly in challenging obvious critic-bait like John Zorn's "projects."
"Jesus, that didn't even occur to me"--take ten seconds, Joe, and ask yourself why it didn't occur to you.
It's also funny to me that no one will say exactly what they mean. Perhaps because they know it's nonsense. Maybe they trotted it out later.
ha--at least he wasn't talking about the blues, which he also claimed to hate reflexivelyIf 'jazz' ever becomes a protected characteristic Steve's comments are going to look very bad.
yes of course, same degree of milking other people's work for your own jagoff bouillabaisse.(I think he said similar things about Laswell, didn't he?)
anyway, mediocre day, as noted it's an ongoing process. time is sort of meaningless for me. it feels it's been two months but somehow the last time i saw him alive feels like five years ago.