llllllllllllllllllll wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 1:27 pm
Even if you’re only talking about extradition, the Noriega thing was way different. He was a CIA asset actually involved with smuggling and drugs that the US was well aware of and not part of a fictitious cartel. He also wasn‘t sitting on top of a huge oil reserve that that been expropriated by the state. He was a right wing fuckwad that was revealed to be a part of an even bigger scandal and was an embarrassment that had ran afoul of his protectors.
I think that when we look at this stuff we should fight when we feel ourselves falling back on hollywood caricatures of latin american drug lords just because that’s how we’re taught to look at this stuff because that is exactly what right wing assholes are counting on you doing. This is part of a bigger war between an ex-colony and a super power that feels entitled to it. To continue harping on drugs - which pales in the face of the actual resources at play - in this context is akin to going on about weapons of mass destruction in the second Iraq war.
This is well articulated. I think many on the left, myself included, have gotten bogged down in the rhetorical back and forth. They give questionable justifications (WMDs, narco terrorism) and we go to work researching and explaining why these things don't hold water. Whereas others (perhaps you here?) would brush aside their cover story and not even bother to joust over its factuality since it's bound to be bullshit and we all know what the Trump is in this for. This is even simpler to do than it was a couple decades ago because Trump is wired to say the quiet part so very loud.
Still, I feel compelled to contextualize the actual role of Venezuela's contribution to the drug trade if only because every right winger in my country is so convinced it's diabolically massive. But I have a kind of Socratic devotion to wasting my time on idiots.