Yeah, he won't answer the question. I'm done trying.Wood Goblin wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:30 pm What do you mean, “Who else is going to stop them?”
You know there is a US military base on Greenland already, right? And there’s this thing called NATO?
There is literally nothing that could stop us from protecting Greenland from Russia or China other than a conscious choice not to do so. We are not constrained from defending it.
This is like saying “who else could stop Russia from seizing Finland” as a justification for seizing Finland.
Re: Politics
7012DO NOT ENGAGE!
DO NOT ENGAGE!
DO NOT ENGAGE!
DO NOT ENGAGE!
DO NOT ENGAGE!
Nothing major here. Just a regular EU cock. I pull it out and there is beans all over my penis. Bean shells all over my penis...
Re: Politics
7013Can you also ask yourself, what would the logistics of all that look like!? Countries half way across the world invading a block of ice...!? In which way would they sustain the invasion? Putin's or XI are gonna ship 100.000 people there to live?Wood Goblin wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:30 pm There is literally nothing that could stop us from protecting Greenland from Russia or China other than a conscious choice not to do so. We are not constrained from defending it.
I am all for good ribbing, but being a Scott Jennings of the PRF world still makes you a nihilist asshole.
Nothing major here. Just a regular EU cock. I pull it out and there is beans all over my penis. Bean shells all over my penis...
Re: Politics
7014i think that's true. this is trump's way of breaking up with nato.Wood Goblin wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:30 pm What do you mean, “Who else is going to stop them?”
You know there is a US military base on Greenland already, right? And there’s this thing called NATO?
There is literally nothing that could stop us from protecting Greenland from Russia or China other than a conscious choice not to do so. We are not constrained from defending it.
This is like saying “who else could stop Russia from seizing Finland” as a justification for seizing Finland.
Re: Politics
7015You have as good of a chance of hb@of answering your question as he does of a winning hand at poker.
I'd rather be throwing darts.
Re: Politics
7016defending greenland does not have to mean boots on the ground. it involves subs, drones, ports, mines, and human intelligence. use your imagination.Lu Zwei wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:47 pmCan you also ask yourself, what would the logistics of all that look like!? Countries half way across the world invading a block of ice...!? In which way would they sustain the invasion? Putin's or XI are gonna ship 100.000 people there to live?Wood Goblin wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:30 pm There is literally nothing that could stop us from protecting Greenland from Russia or China other than a conscious choice not to do so. We are not constrained from defending it.
all in good fun. i'm the least nihilistic guy u know.I am all for good ribbing, but being a Scott Jennings of the PRF world still makes you a nihilist asshole.
Re: Politics
7017you show your hand and i'll show mine.Krev wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:03 pm You have as good of a chance of hb@of answering your question as he does of a winning hand at poker.
Re: Politics
7018I don't care to see the lubed hand you employ while watching The Magnificent Others.hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:07 pmyou show your hand and i'll show mine.Krev wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:03 pm You have as good of a chance of hb@of answering your question as he does of a winning hand at poker.
I'd rather be throwing darts.
Re: Politics
7019...aaaaand Jason Bourne!hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:04 pm defending greenland does not have to mean boots on the ground. it involves subs, drones, ports, mines, and human intelligence. use your imagination.
Nothing major here. Just a regular EU cock. I pull it out and there is beans all over my penis. Bean shells all over my penis...